Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
|
09-06-2010, 07:06 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
??????
|
|||
09-08-2010, 12:20 AM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
I think you would want to be a bit richer on full boost... 12:1 or
maybe even 11.5:1 @ 1 bar. Cheers... jondee86 |
|||
09-08-2010, 09:45 AM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
I went for:
And this is the result according to LC-1 12 or lower sounds too much for NA. That's ok for Turbo. |
|||
09-08-2010, 11:19 AM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
I am not familiar with the program CROME. But looking at the graph,
it seems that columns 1 - 5 are vacuum, and TP6 - TP10 are boost ?? If this is so, and you are considering only NA, then only the columns 1 - 5 are available for your selection. And of course if you are considering only NA, then 12.7:1 or close would be fine for max rpm/load. Cheers... jondee86 |
|||
09-08-2010, 11:22 AM
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
This is NA, no turbo, no boost
Horizontal line is engine load. ECU is set to use MAP under 25% of TPS and after that TPS. So, columns 1-5 are MAP readings, and 6-10 are TPS. Vertical is engine speed, of course. |
|||
09-08-2010, 03:17 PM
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
Hi,
Normally you should run your engine with lambda 0.90, this is the best value for performance. But for sure you can only check it on a dyno. Mine engine needed lambda 0.87 under full load. When you have a cat you should map lambda 1.00 (in part load). The reason for this is that the cat only works in a small range around lambda 1.00 A simple rule: For performance you need lambda 0.90 and for economics you should map lambda 1.10. Full load, best performance between 0.90 – 0.88. I hope this helps. Ron |
|||
09-08-2010, 06:05 PM
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
You can run pretty lean in low load cruise conditions... saves a bunch of fuel.
Somehow I doubt anyone here would ever try that though. A Prius for instance runs 1:17 under such conditions if I remember correctly..... FABRICA MI DIEM, PVNC! |
|||
09-08-2010, 07:37 PM
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
Is there any EGT info? Just installed an EGT meter (leftover from a previous project) and under light city driving conditions (40-60km/h under 3k rpm in 5th) it shows 350-450 celsius, on the motorway it shows around 600-650 3500-4000rpm up to 130km/h. Are these values normal? The engine is stock bigport map close to it's end of life.
http://www.ae86.hu |
|||
09-08-2010, 11:29 PM
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
Uzelac Wrote:Horizontal line is engine load. Ahhh... now I understand Nice way to get MAP/TPS blend. Cheers... jondee86 |
|||
09-09-2010, 09:40 AM
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
Question to the self-mapper among us: AFR target ?
Ivan141 Wrote:You can run pretty lean in low load cruise conditions... saves a bunch of fuel. No worries, will try, as soon as i get EGT sensor |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Question to the self-mapper among us: Knock detection? | MartinS | 8 | 7,840 |
07-09-2010 10:04 AM Last Post: Speedline |
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)