MAP/AMF???

[Bean]

NoHachi Wrote:Not true. ITB's+ hot cams are the one situation where an AFM based setup would be infinately more easy to setup and tune. I think most of the hot cammed ITB engines run TPS based load sensing, not MAP based. As its very difficult to generate consistent and decent vacuum with the short trumpets. Either way, AFM would result in better fueling at the cost of slightly less power.

but then, as said, you would need an intake manifold.. to fit the AFM too... so not too easy as well - TPS based is something different again... also you can run ITB without very hot cams (i.e ~256-264, maybe even 270) and still get decent vacuum...